Algorithmic Light was a project conducted over the course of 2023, enquiring how technologies of artificial intelligence (defined broadly to encompass many diverse systems, including machine vision) can be deployed creatively, and critically, for investigating, articulating, and re-imagining an ecologically transforming world. It was supported by a research priming grant from the University of York.
A recurrent critique against contemporary “generative” AI systems is the immense toll in energy, water, and highly refined materials necessary for sustaining the intensive computing demands of its supporting infrastructures. Such critiques have also been levelled against claims that AI more generally will be critical in combating future Earthly challenges. These points are undoubtedly key to assessing the significance of contemporary AI, although its infrastructural demands ultimately feed into those sustaining the digital world more broadly, including the systems involved in the essential task of monitoring, mapping, and modelling a changing planet. Subsequently, while the latest modes of generative AI are prompting renewed interest in perennial debates concerning the relationship between human and machinic creativity, these have paid relatively limited attention to how the more-than-human status of AI might affect our conceptual understandings of life on a more-than-human planet – its material tolls aside.
Algorithmic Light utilised a combination of sensory, algorithmic, and generative technologies, reworking both text and image, to examine how we might thus articulate richer, more provocative outlooks and sensibilities towards a ‘natural’ world that is being profoundly affected by sociotechnical activities to an irreversible degree. In so doing, the project gestured towards how contemporary modes of ‘AI-driven’ creativity might yet operate in ways that are not inextricably oppositional to wider material ecologies, but can be generative of alternate practices that better narrate the highly complex, contested domain of human-technical-environmental relations. In the spirit of Philip Agre’s original critical technical practices concerning AI, Algorithmic Light sought to raise points of reflection and enquiry not so much through any apparent ‘success’ compared to established processes – or to absolve the latter of its undoubted harms – but by encouraging dialogues around the frictions, surprises, and outright aporia yielded by its assembly and functioning, entangling multiple registers of thought and practice.
The outcomes of Algorithmic Light have been published within the online journal The Digital Review, as part of the “AI-Augmented Creativity” issue. It can be viewed at this link here.
Another publication, placing Algorithmic Light in the context of more-than-human modes of visualisation, was published as part f the relaunch of British Visual Culture journal, and can be viewed at this link here.